swinkdaddy wrote:Here is something I whipped up over lunch.
Damn, I think I want to get that as a tattoo.
i don't think we want to include make mag on there, we're not affiliated, and that could imply affiliation, which would be bad
a few designs are starting to look a little busy.... a logo or banner wants to be simple, and identifiable, not necessarily everything we do, but emblematic of what we do.
Yeah, that one was meant to be a project logo, like the Pi Pie was an event logo.wammie wrote:-Though the spoonapault and spoon with cherry is pretty cool, it is a representation that favors Minneapolis over Saint Paul, so I don't think this idea is good for the main "trademark" type image.
Oh I don't know; it is a representation that favors the U of M over St. Thomas and Macalester.wammie wrote:-Colors are significant identifiers; I am thinking the state colors of maroon and gold would be ideal for the "standard" design.
metis wrote:theo's makerkitty: can we get her a sawsall? maybe make her a black or grey kitty?
noise wrote:Please, let's not try to design a logo by committee, or we get things like maroon and gold should be the standard colors, ew.
Just let those so inclined continue to do their thing essentially unencumbered and judge them on merit.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests