Could I suggest,
We get a sketch, not a detailed CAD floor plan, but a quick sketch together showing what was described? I think I have had enough time in the space old and new and discussions with Metis, to understand the Metis-speak presented, but I'm guessing there are members who have no idea what a lot of this means relative to the physical space.
We clearly won't all agree, and I'm sure the planning commitee is looking for input before they make their report to the board, so let's facilitate that as best we can by marking up suggested changes to the sketch. It's entirely feasible for the commitee to present plans A-? for discussion and vote at a future meeting, and I don't see any problem with that. It will take time, but that's about all. Also as we all know nothing is permanent, if something doesn't work it can be changed.
I would also strongly suggest that the planning commitee talk, and more importantly listen carefully to the different interest groups. Unless the commitee is willing and able to move, setup, and validate all equipment in it's new locations, they are very dependant on the support and good will of the various interest groups. I think we have all lived through a few "re-orgs" that made relatively little sense to many of us, and caused disruption to our "Making". Let's plan to not do that again.
Sometimes being excellent to each other means sitting on our hands and considering for a bit.